4/26/07

Dinesh D'Sousa Eat Your Heart Out!

In the most recent tome by Mr. D'Sousa, he blamed the attacks of 9-11 on the cultural left. "D’Souza contends that the cultural left is responsible for 9/11 in two ways: by fostering a decadent and depraved American culture that angers and repulses other societies—especially traditional and religious ones— and by promoting, at home and abroad, an anti-American attitude that blames America for all the problems of the world.

Islamic anti-Americanism is not merely a reaction to U.S. foreign policy but is also rooted in a revulsion against what Muslims perceive to be the atheism and moral depravity of American popular culture."

A few days ago in Manchester, New Hampshire, Rudy Giuliani said if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, America will be at risk for another terrorist attack on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001.

But if a Republican is elected, he said, especially if it is him, terrorist attacks can be anticipated and stopped.

“If any Republican is elected president —- and I think obviously I would be the best at this —- we will remain on offense and will anticipate what [the terrorists] will do and try to stop them before they do it,” Giuliani said.

I can't remember the last time Al Gore, Norm Chomsky or MIchael Mooore put on their panty hose and lip gloss to tease Osam, Omar, and the gang.

Let me try to digest all this....
Conservative Republicans dress in drag.
Republicans as drag queens will stop Islamic terrorism.
Cultural leftists don't dress in drag.
Cultural leftists cause Islamic terrorism.

4/25/07

Selling the War in Iraq

I am not a very smart person. I am not very well read. I watch cable news, read a few newspapers, magazines and some blogs on the internet. Before the US invaded Iraq, I knew two things to be true. One, the American forces would not find any WMDs in Iraq. I knew then that WMDs were used as a pre-text for invading Iraq. Two, the US was starting a war in search of unintended consequences. Our leaders' overly optimistic predictions about the flowering of democracy and receiving American forces with jubilation was naive at best and a dangerous delusion at worst. We had no idea what would happen in a country that was held together by a despot once he was deposed. It was obvious to me weeks before the invasion that this was an enormous gamble grounded in falsehoods and unexamined beliefs.

I know, I know you are probably thinking that with the benefit of hindsight, I have distorted or rewrote my own history just as the Bushies continue to do. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Sadly, my two predictions grounded in the little information I gathered have come to past. From my perch in the "unwashed" midwest, my bullshit detector was making loud noises.

Everyone should watch Bill Moyer's documentary "Buying the War."
Our pundit class inside the Beltway colluded with the neocons to bring us this mess. Good job guys!

Sooner vs. Later

Even though the mid-term elections brought us Democratic majorities in both houses of congress, the Republican talking heads and talking points repeated the same message over and over again. “The Democrats don’t have a real strategy for Iraq.” Various beltway pundits internalized the same talking points in their pronouncements on the Sunday morning chat shows. “Although Iraq is a mess and most of the blame rests with the Bush Presidency, the Democrats must step up and present a real plan for the future of Iraq.” Clearly, there were various policy camps among the Dems. Murtha wanted immediate withdrawal of the troops. Clinton, parsing her words, wanted closure but did not advance and a specific approach. Lieberman, not really a Dem anymore, pointed fingers at his compatriots and claimed his party’s lack of support for the war would lead to chaos.

With the legislation the Senate and House are submitting to President Bush, the Dems have put together a plan. We will fund the troops, but set deadlines for extricating ourselves from Iraq. As someone not invited to the Correspondent’s Dinner and never had the special opportunity to talk with Don Imus, I may not have the inherent wisdom as the Washington pundit class. Nevertheless, I think I see a strategy for Iraq that appears coherent and supported by 98% of the Dems in the House and Senate (with some Republicans thrown in!).

Now many of the same commentators are unhappy with the Dems approach. The Dems recent strategy for Iraq is too “defeatist” and they will cave when Bush vetoes their bill. Harry Reid has been excoriated for declaring that the United States has lost militarily in Iraq. Who is kidding whom? It’s obvious to anyone watching this tragedy unfold over the past fours that our soldiers and guns will not bring peace to Iraq. All the military can do is contain and control some of the violence. First, the Dems don’t have a plan. When they do put together a plan, the plan is fraught with problems.

I believe the pundits are overlooking a key element in the debate about Iraq. The goal posts have moved but in a direction that they didn’t expect. The bill that is being presented to Bush has dramatically changed the playing field. We now are discussing timetables for withdrawal, rereading the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group, and developing scenarios for the future of the Middle East once the US military is no longer fighting Iraq’s civil war.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we will leave Iraq to the Iraqis sooner vs. later. Even Dick Cheney knows this. And the Dems have played a significant role in changing the nature of the debate. There will be more hysterics and gnashing of teeth. Finger pointing will ensue.

Let’s not forget who got us into this morass. And frankly, who is unwilling or unable to get us out. This is a guy whose idea of foreign travel is to visit Nebraska. He didn’t know the differences between the Shia and Sunnis and yet he was going to transform Iraq into a Texas-style democracy. Bush undoubtedly will go down as one of our worst modern Presidents.

The Dems have changed the political dynamics about the future of the American involvement in Iraq. Their efforts may be labeled sloppy, defeatist, and ill timed. It doesn’t matter. We all know this Iraq catastrophe must end. Finally, the Dems have come together and are doing what the loyal opposition is supposed to do.

4/23/07

Pop Quiz: Can you guess which wingnut made this statement?

Deconstructing the Tragedy at Virginia Tech

1. “Well, who has created a situation ethics, essentially, zone of not being willing to talk about any of these things. Let me carry another example. I strongly supported Imus being dismissed, but I also think the very thing he was dismissed for, which is the use of language which is stunningly degrading of women — the fact, for example, that one of the Halloween costumes this last year was being able to be either a prostitute or a pimp at 10, 11, 12 years of age, buying a costume, and we don’t have any discussion about what’s happened to our culture because while we’re restricting political free speech under McCain-Feingold, we say it’s impossible to restrict vulgar and vicious and anti-human speech. And I would argue that that’s a major component of what’s happened to our culture in the last 40 years.”

A. Newt Gingrich
B. Michael Medved
C. Hugh Hewitt
D. Peggy Noonan

2. "At the very least, count the shots and jump him reloading or changing hands. Better yet, just jump him. Handguns aren't very accurate, even at close range. I shoot mine all the time at the range, and I still can't hit squat. I doubt this guy was any better than I am. And even if hit, a .22 needs to find something important to do real damage—your chances aren't bad.

Yes, yes, I know it's easy to say these things: but didn't the heroes of Flight 93 teach us anything? As the cliche goes—and like most cliches. It's true—none of us knows what he'd do in a dire situation like that. I hope, however, that if I thought I was going to die anyway, I'd at least take a run at the guy."

A. Oliver North
B. John Derbyshire
C. Ann Coulter
D. Rush Limbaugh

3. "There’s no polite way or time to say it: American colleges and universities have become coddle industries. Big Nanny administrators oversee speech codes, segregated dorms, politically correct academic departments, and designated “safe spaces” to protect students selectively from hurtful (conservative) opinions—while allowing mob rule for approved leftist positions (textbook case: Columbia University’s anti-Minuteman Project protesters).

Instead of teaching students to defend their beliefs, American educators shield them from vigorous intellectual debate. Instead of encouraging autonomy, our higher institutions of learning stoke passivity and conflict-avoidance.

And as the erosion of intellectual self-defense goes, so goes the erosion of physical self-defense."

A. Michelle Malkin
B. Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
C. Glenn Beck
D. Sean Hannity

4. "Still, I wonder --- was Cho taught to hate? Whatever he learned in his classes --- did it enable him to rage at his host country, to hate the students he envied so murderously? Was he subtly encouraged to aggrandize himself by destroying others? Was his pathology enabled by the PC university? Or to ask the question differently --- was Cho ever taught to respect others, to admire the good things about his host country, and to discipline himself to build a positive life?

And that answer is readily available on the websites of Cho's English Department at Virginia Tech. This is a wonder world of PC weirdness. English studies at VT are a post-modern Disney World in which nihilism, moral and sexual boundary breaking, and fantasies of Marxist revolutionary violence are celebrated. They show up in a lot of faculty writing. Not by all the faculty, but probably by more than half."

A. Charles Krauthammer
B. David Frum
C. John Lewis
D. Lynn Cheney

The answers are 1.A, 2.B, 3.A, and 4.C. If you got at least 3 correct, you are entitled to become an unpaid intern at TownHall.Com.

Did Not Serve

Kudos to our friends at operationyellowelephant.blogspot.com for compiling this list.



Military Service Records, prominent Republicans
Dick Cheney: did not serve. Several deferments, the last by marriage.
Dennis Hastert: did not serve.
Tom Delay: did not serve.
Roy Blunt: did not serve.
Bill Frist: did not serve.
Mitch McConnell: did not serve.
Rick Santorum: did not serve.
Trent Lott: did not serve.
John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments to teach business.
Jeb Bush: did not serve.
Karl Rove: did not serve.
Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. "Bad knee." The man who attacked Max Cleland's patriotism.
Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve.
Vin Weber: did not serve.
Richard Perle: did not serve.
Douglas Feith: did not serve.
Eliot Abrams: did not serve.
Richard Shelby: did not serve.
John Kyl: did not serve.
Tim Hutchison: did not serve.
Christopher Cox: did not serve.
Newt Gingrich: did not serve.
Don Rumsfeld: served in Navy (1954-57) as flight instructor.
George W. Bush: failed to complete his six-year National Guard; got assigned to Alabama so he could campaign for family friend running for U.S. Senate; failed to show up for required medical exam, disappeared from duty.
Ronald Reagan: due to poor eyesight, served in a non-combat role making movies.
B-1 Bob Dornan: Enlisted after fighting was over in Korea.
Phil Gramm: did not serve.
John McCain: Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross.
Dana Rohrabacher: did not serve.
John M. McHugh: did not serve.
JC Watts: did not serve.
Jack Kemp: did not serve. "Knee problem," although continued in NFL for 8 years.
Dan Quayle: Journalism unit of the Indiana National Guard.
Rudy Giuliani: did not serve.
George Pataki: did not serve.
Spencer Abraham: did not serve.
John Engler: did not serve.
Lindsey Graham: National Guard lawyer.
Arnold Schwarzenegger: AWOL from Austrian army base.

Pundits & Preachers
Sean Hannity: did not serve.
Rush Limbaugh: did not serve (4-F with a 'pilonidal cyst.')
Bill O'Reilly: did not serve.
Michael Savage: did not serve.
George Will: did not serve.
Chris Matthews: did not serve.
Paul Gigot: did not serve.
Bill Bennett: did not serve.
Pat Buchanan: did not serve.
John Wayne: did not serve.
Bill Kristol: did not serve.
Kenneth Starr: did not serve.
Antonin Scalia: did not serve.
Clarence Thomas: did not serve.
Ralph Reed: did not serve.
Michael Medved: did not serve.
Charlie Daniels: did not serve.
Ted Nugent: did not serve. (He only shoots at things that don't shoot back.)

American Military Casualties (4-21-07):

Deaths: 3,323
Wounded: 24,314

Do as I say..Don't do as I do.

4/20/07

Our President at one of his more eloquent moments during a Tipp City, OH town hall meeting.


"Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." H.L. Mencken

The Trouble with Dining Out


This past Friday, my wife and I snuck into a very nice restaurant in Cincinnati to grab dinner before going to the theater. We only had about 45 minutes and decided to sit at the bar thinking it would encourage faster service. I had a martini and my wife ordered a cosmopolitan. Well, the homemade pasta dinners were outstanding. I asked for the bill and started to pull out my plastic to give to the bartender. I normally don't cower over the bill. This time I did take a moment and discovered that we were charged $10 each for my martini and my wife's cosmo. Twenty bucks for two mixed drinks was a little spendy as my in-laws from Minnesota would say!

Since when has it become standard practice for restaurants to charge patrons double digits for a modest amount of gin and a splash of dry vermouth? Or for some cranberry juice, vodka and triple sec? It also has become a standard practice to charge patrons $9 or $10 for a glass of wine. Where have I been for the past ten years? Is my short-term memory that bad? It seems just a few months ago, a little ice, spirits and various flavorings was a $5 investment.

My wife can attest to my gastronomic leanings. I am not a cheap person. I enjoy a great evening at a wonderful restaurant. It is reflected in my increasing girth and age-related lethargy. As someone who is a Food Network junkie and enjoys cooking, I do appreciate the skill involved and commitment to high standards in fine restaurants. When training, creativity and quality ingredients come together, dining out can be a transcendent experience. My American Express card bill reflects my weakness for gastronomic adventures.

Recently, I had a rabbit ragout on a bed of homemade parpadelle. This was wonderful dish! The ragout had great depth of flavor. And the parpadelle? It was wonderfully fresh tasting with just enough bite. This primi dish was priced over $20. I was happy to pay for it. I have some inkling of the time and energy that when into preparing it. It really reflects a wonderful balance of artistry and the best ingredients.

However, my enthusiasm wanes and my Scrooge tendencies become more pronounced when I order a few mixed drinks and my bar bill is equivalent to the amount Rush Limbaugh spends on drugs during a wild weekend in the Dominican Republic! I guess I do not fully appreciate the mixologist's craft. I am more than happy to tip a bartender who makes a good martini. Hopefully that tip goes directly into the bartender's pocket. I just don't understand how the basic elements of a martini have become so spendy!

Who out there wants to join me in a crusade to stop martini inflation? It really is becoming harder for someone to destroy his or her liver with the proliferation of over-priced mixed drinks. Social movements don't happen overnight. It takes one courageous person willing to step up to the bar and demand a reasonably priced martini. We can win this battle if you too are willing to stop buying over-priced martinis when you are dining out.

Dining out can be a wonderful experience. When did gin become so expensive?

4/18/07

Chimps Evolved More than Humans

From Yahoo News......

"Since the human-chimp split about 6 million years ago, chimpanzee genes can be said to have evolved more than human genes, a new study suggests.

The results, detailed online this week in the "Proceedings" of the large brains, cognitive abilities and bi-pedalism.

Jianzhi Zhang of the University of Michigan and his colleagues analyzed strings of DNA from nearly 14,000 protein-coding genes shared by chimps and humans. They looked for differences gene by gene and whether they caused changes in the generated proteins.

Genes act as instructions that organisms use to make proteins and thus are integral to carrying out biological functions, such as transporting oxygen to the body’s cells. Different versions of the same gene are called alleles.

Changes in DNA that affect the making of proteins are considered functional changes, while “silent” changes do not affect the proteins. “If we see an excess of functional changes (compared to silent changes) the inference is these functional changes occurred because they were positively selected, because they were useful in some way to the organism,” said study team member Margaret Bakewell, also of UM.

Bakewell, Zhang and a colleague found that substantially more genes in chimps evolved in ways that were beneficial than was the case with human genes...."

Here is some recent evidence:

Knee Jerk Reactions to the Massacre at Virginia Tech

"Happiness is a warm gun (Happiness bang, bang, shoot, shoot)
Happiness is a warm gun, mama (Happiness bang, bang, shoot, shoot)
When I hold you in my arms (Oo-oo oh yeah)
And I feel my finger on your trigger (Oo-oo oh yeah)
I know no one can do me no harm (Oo-oo oh yeah)
Because happiness is a warm gun, mama (Happiness bang, bang, shoot, shoot)
Happiness is a warm gun, yes it is (Happiness bang, bang, shoot, shoot)
Happiness is a warm, yes it is, gun (Happiness bang, bang, shoot, shoot)
Well, don't you know happiness is a warm gun, mama? (Happiness is a warm gun, yeah)."

It’s the guns stupid! The International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) reports that the overwhelming majority of school related shootings have occurred in the USA. Since the IANSA started keeping track in 1996, the United States leads the world in the number of small arms shootings in schools and colleges worldwide.

We are drowning in handguns. Here are some statistics from 2002.

• Every 10 seconds, a gun is made in America. 

• A recent Justice Department study shows Americans own 65 million handguns
• Handguns account for two-thirds of firearm crime and more than 80% of all firearm 
homicides. Each year, nearly a million violent crimes are committed with handguns.
• On an average day, more than a million Americans are carrying guns outside their workplace. Two million more keep guns in their cars and trucks.
• Close to 40,000 Americans die each year from gunfire. Nearly half of these deaths are homicides committed with cheap, easily obtainable, American-made handguns.

Our disturbed student at Virginia Tech legally purchased a handgun before he went on his shooting rampage. He had no criminal record. He presented 3 forms of ID. And most importantly, he had the money to purchase a $571 handgun at a local store within 40 miles of the campus. Under the federal assault-weapons ban enacted in 1994, handgun magazines were limited to 10 rounds. But that ban was allowed to expire in 2004. Cho used high-capacity magazines containing as many as 33 rounds in each clip. That may explain the carnage at Virginia Tech.

Guns and gun ownership are deeply embedded into our culture. Using violence to resolve conflict is also very much part of our history. Regardless of how disturbed or angry Cho was, he had the right to purchase and own handguns. I cannot believe that the framers of the Constitution would endorse our distorted interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. Did Mr. Lambert believe when he drafted “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” would ultimately become 65 millions handguns owned, sold and discharged in ways that have nothing to do with protecting our free State!

Which politician has the courage to take this issue on? Democrats are so busy pumping psychological testosterone into their campaigns, they are afraid to be labeled as” girly men.” Some pundits and political operatives believe Gore lost Tennessee and West Virginia in 2000 due to his past support of gun control. Gun control has become a radioactive issue for our new muscled-bound majority. Gun advocates are impassionate voters and gun control supporters are weak kneed.

There are too many handguns on the street in Philadelphia, Cincinnati, and Blacksburg! This is a public health crisis. Handgun violence is destroying families. It is eroding our sense of community and safety in our public spaces.

“According to an IANSA report published in 2006, gun-related incidents result in 300,000 fatalities and one million injuries worldwide every year. Many of those guns come from the U.S. Mexican authorities reported that 80 percent of guns in the country came from the U.S., 50 percent of handguns seized by Canada's gun crime task force were also smuggled across the U.S. border and 30 percent of guns recovered by Japanese authorities originated in the U.S., the IANSA found.
’I think that the US have a problem. But they do not want to face it. They hide behind the 2nd amendment.’”

How can a rational person believe that Cho’s use of high capacity magazines that had 33 rounds per clip reflects the drafter’s intent of the 2nd amendment? Let the debate start anew! I am sick and tired that handgun advocates distort the 2nd Amendment to justify this kind of carnage at Virginia Tech.

4/16/07

Dyno Mite!

An important value of social conservatives is maintaining traditional families. Given that J.J's TV family has broken up, he is now an orphan. Ann Coulter attempting to deflect criticism that she is a heartless, media hungry, demagogue, has adopted J.J. She plans to home school J.J. He will also become her personal food taster since the recent demise of her former adopted son, Bishop T.D. Jakes.

4/13/07

W.E.B. Du Bois wrote in The Souls of Black Folk, “... the problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of the color-line."

I have many questions and fewer answers.

Who are the victims here? The Duke students wrongly indicted for rape? The Rutgers Women’s Basketball Team? Deidre Imus? Gwen Ifell?

Why is it left to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to help us find our moral compass? Sadly, they have become racial ambulance chasers. Each competes with the other for face time on cable news.

Can’t the various media sources find women to comment? This morning on Today we were offered only Tavis Smiley and Cornel West trying to provide some analysis. Imus’ comments were racist but they also were incredibly misogynistic. Although I respect both gentlemen, I want to hear a woman's perspective.

Young white males buy more rap music than any other demographic group. Imus clearly knew he was validating a stereotype about African American women reinforced by popular culture. Why are African American women portrayed in such degrading ways? By the dominate culture and by other African Americans in the music industry?

The outrage happened not in a great tidal wave but as a slow burn. Why did it take so long for the authorities to exonerate the Duke students? Why do the wheels of justice turn so slowly? It was obvious months ago that the Duke students should not have been indicted.

Imus made his comments on his morning show about the Rutgers b-ball team on Wednesday, April 3rd. He didn’t apologize for his remarks until Friday, April 5th. CBS fired him yesterday (April 12th). Apparently, Imus didn’t think he stepped over the line until someone told him that he did. NBC and CBS only decided they would fire Imus once they examined their ledger sheets.

What are the lasting lessons learned by the 3 Duke students? In a convoluted way, they too are victims of the color line.

The Rutgers women, in a powerful way, spoke truth to power. Their quiet dignity and courage should teach us all a lesson. They brought down the House of Imus without raising their voices. Are Sean Hannity, Snoop Dog, Fifty Cent or Rush Limbaugh paying attention?

What would W.E.B. Dubois say about the beginning of the 21st Century? As the Duke students look across the color line, what do they see in their future? As the Rutgers women stepped over the color line, how many of us are willing to go with them?

I have many questions and fewer answers. Our country’s tragic legacy of slavery and racism is still deeply embedded in our public discourse.

4/10/07

Joined at the Hip

I know, I know this a very cheap shot. But doesn't the First Lady look a little like Cesar Romero playing the Joker in the Batman TV show?And what is with those wabbits? They are an Easter nightmare waiting to happen. Perhaps Mitt, Buffalo Bill from Boston, can take them out with his NRA sanctioned special!

4/9/07

The Wafflers!

It is hard to imagine what the beltway pundits and right-wing attack dogs would have done if the various Democratic candidates came out with as many contradictions, lies and distortions about their political views and past histories as our seven dwarfs on the Republican side have done. Gore, Clinton and Kerry have been vilified for “waffling" or “shaving the truth.”

Let’s look at the evidence. How about Mitt Romney? (Happy). Mitt had an extensive record of supporting a woman’s right of choice, gay rights, and other very progressive positions as the Governator of Massachusetts. Now, Happy Romney is sucking up to the conservative legions in the Republican Party by claiming he had an epiphany over the past few years and now is a gun-toting, gay bashing, anti-abortion zealot. He now claims he loves guns and has been shooting at anything that moves for years. Unfortunately, the record shows that he never owned a hunting license and maybe just maybe he shot at a few wabbits and wodents when he was a youngster.

How about Rudy Giuliani? (Grumpy). Rudy, the former mayor of one the most open and liberal cities in the USA, is also running to the right wing of the Republican Party. He’s changing his political stripes from blue to red faster than a Newt Gingrich divorce! Rudy continues to support a women’s right of choice even contending that poor women have a right to federally-funded abortions! However, he was recently quoted as saying, “On the federal judiciary I would want judges who are strict constructionists because I am. I have a very, very strong view that for this country to work, for our freedoms to be protected, judges have to interpret, not invent, the Constitution.” Ladies and Gentlemen, strict constructionists are code words for conservative appointments to the federal judiciary. Additionally, a few years ago, he asserted that partial-birth abortions legislation should be overturned. Now, he supports it. He also has stated that he is a proponent of gay rights, but believes marriage is a union between a man and a woman. However, he sees no need for a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage.

Grumpy is clearly tiptoeing through the tulips! Although he is not running away from past beliefs as fast as Joseph Smith from Boston, he clearly is talking in political code that appeases the right-wing thought police.

And John McCain? (Doc). Based on historical dwarf records, Doc is considered the leader of the seven dwarfs, and is presumably the oldest. John like Rudy has taken on a political juggling act that appears to be bombing in the hinterland. His 2000 campaign was heralded as the straight talk express. He was the darling of the media and a real maverick in the Republican world of political hegemony. Doc bellowed at the intolerance and xenophobia of the social conservatives in his party after losing the South Carolina primary to Bush in 2000.

Now, he is sucking up the same crowd of zealots who are preaching that the ends times are coming-Falwell, Robertson and Hagee. McCain claimed that he would both support overturning and not support overturning Roe v. Wade and, in 2005, he claimed that he agreed "to some degree" that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. McCain also issued a statement in 2006 indicating that if he were the governor of South Dakota, he "would have signed" a controversial bill outlawing all abortions except in those situations in which the life of the woman is threatened, but that he "would also take the appropriate steps under state law -- in whatever state -- to ensure that the exceptions of rape, incest or life of the mother were included. In recent interviews, McCain has changed his position on abortion more times than Bush’s justification for the Iraq War.

The other candidates, Mike Huckabee (Sleepy) and Duncan Hunter (Crazy), are probably less likely to waffle or obfuscate their views because no one is paying any attention to them. Mike’s best political option is to focus on health nuts. He lost a great deal of weight and is now a marathon runner.

Duncan, well Duncan is just crazy. Here is a brief quote from a recent interview with Crazy. “I think that we've got to do us a two-step program and the first step is to secure the border and the second step then is to...do internal enforcement. You've got 250,000 hard-core criminals - in federal, state, and local penitentiaries and jails. That means you have a large criminal element that's operating within the US committing serious crimes against Americans and their property and once we secure the border, I would make an emphasized effort to ensure that we are to round up criminal aliens and...force their deportation.” Duncan also has dirty hands related to the defense contractors’ scandal in Southern California that put the “Duke-Stir” in jail.

I am the first to acknowledge that there are Democratic candidates that are less than truthful. It really is the nature of modern political discourse. Nevertheless, the three top dwarfs on the Republican side, Happy, Grumpy and Doc, seem to be running away from their past opinions and statements faster than Rush Limbaugh uses up his prescription medications! Why haven’t any of the talking heads on Imus, Meet the Press, or Faux News focused our attention on these glaring inconsistencies? If John Kerry was a "waffler," then Mitt Romney is a bait and switch time-share condo salesman!

4/4/07

The Battle of the Head-Scarfs!

I guess some of our friends in the rightwing blogosphere and columnists for the Murdoch media cabal are upset that Speaker Pelosi is visiting Syria. And she has the gall to wear a head-scarf visiting some muslim religious sites in Damascus. What do they expect Nancy to wear? A San Francisco Giants cap?

Respecting local cultural and religious customs, W's better half has worn the same accessory many times in her various travels as the First Lady.

Frankly, neither looks good. They look like extras in a Masterpiece Theatre set piece on PBS.

4/3/07

It's the New Duck and Cover!


When I come across a headline such as "The Good News About Nuclear Destruction" I have to take notice. Here is the link: Good News. Our friends at WorldNetDaily.Com published an article with that title. WorldNet are the same folks that brought us a thoughtful piece that decries the uses of soy. According to the author of the article too much soy creates "girly men" and increases the rates of homosexuality in the USA.

Not surprisingly the author of nuclear article, Shane Connor, is CEO of a company that sells products that are to detect radiation levels or protect us from nuclear fallout. His general thesis is that most people will not die immediately if they are not at ground zero. They will die from radiation poisoning in the few days after an attack. If however, we take some his of sound advice and buy an array of his products we can not only survive but prosper after a nuclear attack!

Mr. Connor decries those disarmament folks of the 80s who ridiculed attempts to educate folks about civil defense. Don't you remember those black and white educational films in the 50s that all school-aged kids were required to watch? The announcer declared, "If you see a mushroom cloud and hear an explosion outside your school window, just duck and cover." The film would show children jumping under their little desks in the classroom to protect themselves from the atomic blast. Ah yes, the good old days. Take a look at the original Duck and Cover film.

I think some our folks on the right side of dial believe the emerging threat of nuclear terrorism makes civil defense and many of Mr. Connor's products increasingly more viable in this new era of paranoia.

I guess Mr. Connor has a legitimate point. I only wish he wasn't directly profiting from this potential nightmare. The commie threat may be gone. Don't despair. Islamofacism is the new boogie man and there is money to be made! I just find the "good news" bit a little hard to swallow.